Explore live data

Market evolution: Iron steel articles (CN 73) — 2015–2025

Introduction

Customs heading 73 — Articles of Iron or Steel — is one of the broadest product categories in EU trade, encompassing everything from screws, bolts and fasteners (7318) to structural steelwork (7308), welded and seamless tubes (7304, 7306), cast articles, cookers, chains, and wire products. The scope & definitions section of the underlying dashboard lists 26 four-digit sub-headings that roll up into this code.

Between 2015 and 2025 the EU's trade in CN 73 underwent a profound transformation. Export values rose modestly while export volumes actually declined; import values and volumes both surged; and the EU's historically comfortable trade surplus shrank by over 40 %. At the same time, the sector became far more open to international competition — trade intensity nearly doubled — while the geographic composition of both imports and exports was reshaped by sanctions, post-Brexit supply-chain reconfiguration, and the accelerating penetration of Chinese and Turkish suppliers. This report examines these dynamics across three thematic lenses.


1. A Rising Import Tide and a Narrowing Trade Surplus

The headline trade balance deteriorated by 42 %

In 2015 the EU ran a surplus of €15.95 billion in articles of iron and steel with non-EU countries. By 2025 that figure had fallen to €9.24 billion — a contraction of 42.1 %. The general overview data show that the surplus bottomed out at just €3.15 billion at its trough, underscoring the severity of the swing.

Indicator 2015 2025 Change
Exports — value (€ bn) 36.84 44.53 +20.9 %
Exports — volume (Mt) 12.14 9.73 −19.9 %
Imports — value (€ bn) 20.89 35.29 +68.9 %
Imports — volume (Mt) 8.46 12.94 +52.9 %
Trade balance (€ bn) +15.95 +9.24 −42.1 %

The table reveals an asymmetry at the heart of the period: EU export values grew by 21 % even as export volumes fell by 20 %, meaning that higher unit prices (up 50.9 %, from €3,034/t to €4,578/t) were the sole driver of export value growth. On the import side, by contrast, both volume (+52.9 %) and price (+10.5 %) contributed, with volume being the dominant factor.

Net import reliance confirmed the EU's structural resilience — but only just

Throughout the period, the EU remained a net exporter of iron and steel articles, with net import reliance staying negative (−6.5 % in 2015, −7.2 % in 2025). However, the indicator swung to −1.5 % at its peak (worst) reading, meaning the EU came perilously close to becoming a net importer in that year. The minimum reading of −18.3 % — the strongest net-exporter position — likely reflects a period of depressed import demand.

Structural steel (7308) drove the import volume explosion

The product segment breakdown reveals that the most dramatic import growth occurred in heading 7308 — Structures and parts of structures (bridges, towers, lattice masts, doors, windows, scaffolding, etc.). Import volumes in this sub-heading nearly tripled, from 928,664 t in 2015 to 2,751,628 t in 2025 (+196 %), while import values rose from €1.75 billion to €6.17 billion (+254 %).

Sub-heading Description 2015 vol (kt) 2025 vol (kt) Δ vol 2015 val (€ bn) 2025 val (€ bn) Δ val
7308 Structures & parts of structures 929 2,752 +196 % 1.75 6.17 +254 %
7326 Articles n.e.s. (excl. cast) 1,112 1,874 +69 % 4.05 7.26 +79 %
7318 Screws, bolts, nuts, rivets, washers 1,392 1,831 +32 % 4.57 6.58 +44 %
7306 Welded tubes and pipes 1,337 1,799 +35 % 1.20 1.81 +50 %
7325 Cast articles n.e.s. 465 581 +25 % 0.84 1.19 +41 %
7304 Seamless tubes and pipes 510 518 +2 % 0.93 1.21 +30 %
7321 Stoves, cookers, non-electric appliances 407 316 −23 % 0.95 1.27 +34 %

On the export side, the picture is more muted. The largest export category by value — 7308 (structures) — saw volumes remain essentially flat (2.51 Mt to 2.60 Mt), with value growth from €7.02 billion to €9.78 billion driven almost entirely by unit-price increases (+34 %, from €2,802/t to €3,769/t). Meanwhile, seamless tubes (7304) — historically a strong EU export — saw volumes decline from 1.73 Mt to 1.21 Mt (−30 %), even as their unit price rose from €2,488/t to €3,296/t.

Germany anchors both sides of the ledger

Among EU Member States, Germany is by far the largest trader in CN 73. On the import side, German imports rose from €5.45 billion to €7.74 billion (+42 %), while on the export side they grew from €10.80 billion to €12.70 billion (+18 %). Poland and Spain showed the fastest import growth among major economies (+127 % and +101 % respectively), reflecting the rapid industrialisation and infrastructure investment in Central and Southern Europe.

Reporter 2015 imports (€ bn) 2025 imports (€ bn) Change 2015 exports (€ bn) 2025 exports (€ bn) Change
Germany 5.45 7.74 +42 % 10.80 12.70 +18 %
France 2.19 3.54 +62 % 4.16 3.70 −11 %
Italy 2.12 3.19 +50 % 6.35 6.89 +9 %
Netherlands 2.20 3.48 +59 % 2.02 4.00 +97 %
Poland 1.04 2.36 +127 % 1.27 2.06 +62 %
Spain 1.18 2.37 +101 % 2.91 3.12 +7 %

2. Price Escalation, Cost Inflation, and the 2022 Commodity Shock

Export prices rose five times faster than import prices

A striking feature of the 2015–2025 period is the divergence in price trajectories. EU export unit values increased by 50.9 % (from €3,034/t to €4,578/t), while import unit values rose by only 10.5 % (from €2,469/t to €2,728/t). This divergence has two main explanations:

  1. Product mix: EU exports are concentrated in higher-value-added sub-headings. Screws, bolts and fasteners (7318) — where the EU has strong specialisation — command export prices of over €10,500/t, compared with import prices of around €3,590/t for the same heading. The EU effectively exports precision-engineered fasteners and imports more commodity-grade products.

  2. Cost pass-through: EU producers, facing higher energy and labour costs (especially after 2021), passed these through into export prices more aggressively than third-country suppliers could raise their import prices.

2022 was the year of the price spike

Across almost every sub-heading, 2022 stands out as a peak year for both import and export prices — a reflection of the post-COVID commodity super-cycle and the energy-price surge triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Sub-heading 2015 import price (€/t) 2022 import price (€/t) 2025 import price (€/t) 2015 export price (€/t) 2022 export price (€/t) 2025 export price (€/t)
7318 3,282 3,965 3,590 6,985 9,040 10,586
7308 1,880 2,504 2,242 2,802 3,501 3,769
7306 901 1,476 1,005 1,711 2,802 2,812
7326 3,639 4,335 3,873 4,291 5,580 5,831
7321 2,330 4,876 4,040 — — —
7304 1,824 2,646 2,329 2,488 2,881 3,296

Several notable price shock events were detected:

  • UK imports into the EU (2022): The most significant shock — a 33.7 % price shift with an abnormality score of 23.4, representing 11.6 % of import value. This likely reflects the combined effect of post-Brexit friction costs and the 2022 energy-price surge in the UK steel sector.
  • Vietnam imports into the EU (2022): A 39.7 % price shift (abnormality 11.8), affecting 2.8 % of import value.
  • Algeria — EU exports (2020): A 57.7 % price shift (abnormality 16.8) during the COVID-19 disruption year, affecting 1.5 % of export value.

Import prices for cooking appliances (7321) nearly doubled and never fully corrected

Among the top seven import sub-headings, heading 7321 (stoves, ranges, cookers and non-electric domestic appliances) saw the most extreme price behaviour: import unit values rose from €2,330/t in 2015 to a peak of €4,876/t in 2022, before settling at €4,040/t in 2025 — still 73 % above the 2015 level. Import volumes, meanwhile, dropped from a peak of 653 kt in 2021 to just 316 kt in 2025, suggesting that the price surge materially suppressed demand.


3. Geopolitical Reorientation: Sanctions, Sourcing Shifts, and Growing Concentration

Russia collapsed as both supplier and customer

The most dramatic geopolitical story in CN 73 trade is the near-total disappearance of Russia. EU imports from Russia fell from €220 million in 2015 to just €4.4 million in 2025 (−98.0 %), while EU exports to Russia dropped from €1.35 billion to €133 million (−90.1 %). The volatility data confirm the extremity of this shift: Russia's coefficient of variation stands at 0.98 for imports and 0.81 for exports — far above any other partner and reflecting the sanctions-driven cliff-fall rather than normal cyclical variation.

China and Türkiye filled the vacuum — and then some

While Russia exited, China and Türkiye surged in. EU imports from China rose from €6.60 billion to €14.02 billion (+112.5 %), making China by far the largest import source, accounting for nearly 40 % of total extra-EU imports by value. Türkiye's rise was even steeper in proportional terms: from €1.63 billion to €4.49 billion (+175 %). India also grew strongly, from €1.00 billion to €1.83 billion (+82 %).

Partner 2015 imports (€ bn) 2025 imports (€ bn) Change 2015 exports (€ bn) 2025 exports (€ bn) Change
China 6.60 14.02 +112.5 % 2.22 2.49 +12.3 %
Türkiye 1.63 4.49 +175.0 % 1.19 1.88 +58.1 %
United Kingdom 2.25 2.84 +26.0 % 5.03 5.97 +18.5 %
India 1.00 1.83 +82.3 % — — —
Russian Federation 0.22 0.004 −98.0 % 1.35 0.13 −90.1 %

On the export side, the United States remained the EU's top destination, growing from €5.40 billion to €8.05 billion (+49.1 %). Norway (+49.2 %) and Türkiye (+58.1 %) also posted strong growth as export markets.

Import concentration rose substantially — a vulnerability signal

The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for imports by value climbed from 1,430 to 1,956 (+36.8 %). While still below the conventional 2,500 threshold for a "highly concentrated" market, the trajectory is striking. The concentration by volume rose even faster, from 1,553 to 2,311 (+48.8 %), approaching that threshold. This reflects the growing dominance of China and, to a lesser extent, Türkiye as volume suppliers.

Export concentration also increased, but more modestly (HHI from 618 to 793, +28.4 %), consistent with the EU's more diversified export portfolio across the US, UK, Switzerland, Norway, and others.

EU production scaled up in volume and especially in value

EU domestic production of articles of iron or steel grew in quantity by 30.6 % (from 86.2 Mt to 112.6 Mt) and in value by 208.5 % (from €55.0 billion to €169.7 billion). The fact that value growth (209 %) vastly outpaced volume growth (31 %) mirrors the price escalation observed in trade data and confirms that the cost base of EU steel-article manufacturing has risen dramatically — likely reflecting higher raw-material costs, energy prices, and the carbon cost embedded in EU production under the ETS.

The EU's most and least specialised producers reveal a two-speed Europe

The specialisation analysis for 2025 shows a familiar pattern: smaller, industrialised economies (Estonia, Luxembourg) and traditional manufacturing powerhouses (Italy, Austria) display strong revealed comparative advantage in CN 73, while service-oriented or small island economies (Cyprus, Ireland, Malta) are heavily under-specialised. Belgium and the Netherlands, despite being large absolute traders, are also under-specialised — consistent with their role as logistics hubs that re-export rather than produce.

Most specialised (RSCA) RCA Least specialised (RSCA) RCA
1 Estonia (0.348) 2.07 Cyprus (−0.896) 0.05
2 Luxembourg (0.336) 2.01 Ireland (−0.851) 0.08
3 Italy (0.245) 1.65 Malta (−0.850) 0.08
4 Latvia (0.228) 1.59 Belgium (−0.311) 0.53
5 Austria (0.207) 1.52 Netherlands (−0.283) 0.56

Conclusion

Over the decade 2015–2025, the EU's trade in articles of iron and steel (CN 73) shifted from a position of comfortable surplus to one of mounting competitive pressure. The trade surplus narrowed by 42 %, driven not by declining exports but by a 53 % surge in import volumes — overwhelmingly from China (+113 % in value) and Türkiye (+175 %). The EU's structural steelwork imports (7308) nearly tripled in volume, a signal that major infrastructure and construction supply chains have become substantially more dependent on extra-EU sources.

Price dynamics told a different story. EU export unit values rose 51 % — far outpacing the 11 % rise in import prices — reflecting both a higher-value product mix and the pass-through of elevated European energy and carbon costs. The 2022 commodity and energy shock left a visible imprint across nearly every sub-heading and partner relationship.

Geopolitically, Russia's near-total exit from EU iron-and-steel trade (−98 % on the import side, −90 % on the export side) was the single most dramatic structural change, but it was more than offset by the rise of China and Türkiye. The resulting increase in import concentration (HHI +37 %) is a vulnerability that policymakers will need to monitor, particularly as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) takes full effect and seeks to level the playing field between EU producers subject to the ETS and their third-country competitors.

Generated on 2026-08-07. Figures reflect Eurostat data at generation time and do not include later revisions.

Auto-generated: this report is meant to accelerate, but not to replace, human analysis.

If you need advice on European trade policy, or representation for your interests in Brussels, please contact me at support@tradedashboard.eu. You can find my CV at this address.