Explore live data

Market evolution: Backed aluminium foil (CN 760720) — 2015–2025

Introduction

This report examines the evolution of the European Union's external trade in backed aluminium foil (CN 760720) over the decade spanning 2015 to 2025. The product covers aluminium foil of up to 0.2 mm thickness (excluding backing), backed with paper, plastics, or similar materials, and encompasses three sub-categories: ultra-thin foil below 0.021 mm (76072010), standard backed foil from 0.021 to 0.2 mm (76072099), and aluminium composite panels (76072091). The period under review has been marked by significant structural shifts: the COVID-19 pandemic, the energy crisis following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, escalating trade tensions with China, and broader global supply-chain realignments. Against this backdrop, the EU's trade profile in this product has evolved considerably — from a position of strong net export dominance to one of declining export volumes, surging imports, and a markedly eroded trade surplus.


I. A Surplus Under Pressure: The Erosion of the EU's Trade Balance

The EU remained a net exporter, but the margin shrank dramatically

Throughout the entire 2015–2025 period, the EU maintained a positive trade balance in backed aluminium foil. However, the surplus in value terms contracted from €462.7 million in 2015 to €306.2 million in 2025, a decline of -33.8%. This narrowing reflects two concurrent dynamics: stagnant-to-declining export revenues and sharply rising import bills.

Indicator 2015 2025 Change
Trade balance (€) 462,741,523 306,176,324 -33.8%
Net import reliance (%) -37.4% -10.7% +71.4%

The net import reliance indicator — which is negative when the EU is a net exporter — moved from -37.4% to -10.7%, confirming that the EU's self-sufficiency in this product segment has weakened substantially.

Imports nearly doubled in volume while exports fell by a third

The most striking feature of the decade is the divergence between import and export trajectories:

Metric 2015 (first) 2025 (last) Change
Exports — value (€) 620,642,947 603,110,249 -2.8%
Exports — quantity (t) 114,229 77,086 -32.5%
Exports — price (€/t) 5,433 7,823 +44.0%
Imports — value (€) 157,901,424 296,933,924 +88.1%
Imports — quantity (t) 31,943 62,237 +94.8%
Imports — price (€/t) 4,943 4,771 -3.5%

Export volumes fell by nearly a third, though rising unit prices largely cushioned the revenue impact (value declined only -2.8%). Meanwhile, imports surged by +94.8% in volume and +88.1% in value. Import prices remained broadly flat (a modest -3.5% decline), suggesting the import boom was driven by quantity expansion rather than price effects.

Rising export prices signal a shift toward higher-value, lower-volume shipments

The +44% increase in EU export unit prices (from €5,433/t to €7,823/t) stands in contrast to the near-flat import prices. This pattern is consistent with a structural shift: the EU increasingly focuses on higher-specification or value-added foil products for export while losing ground in standard-grade segments to lower-cost imports. The price differential between EU exports and imports — approximately €3,000 per tonne by 2025 — underscores this segmentation.


II. Shifting Geographies: Partner Dynamics and Geopolitical Ripples

China emerged as the dominant growth driver on the import side

Among import partners, the most dramatic change came from China, whose exports of backed aluminium foil to the EU surged by +317.2% — from €17.4 million in 2015 to €72.7 million in 2025. Other notable import growth was recorded from:

Import Partner 2015 (€) 2025 (€) Change
China 17,433,353 72,732,878 +317.2%
United Kingdom 20,869,014 68,721,053 +229.3%
Türkiye 24,949,069 37,010,079 +48.3%
Japan 894,444 13,418,587 +1,400.2%
Korea, Republic of 2,662,037 24,740,996 +829.4%

China's rise is particularly significant given broader EU–China trade tensions and ongoing anti-dumping investigations in aluminium products. The +829.4% surge from Korea and the +1,400.2% spike from Japan (albeit from a low base) suggest that East Asian producers collectively became major suppliers to the EU market.

Switzerland, traditionally a key import source, saw its share decline by -17.0% (from €60.1M to €49.9M).

Russia's collapse as an export market reshaped EU export geography

On the export side, the most dramatic shift was the near-total loss of the Russian Federation as a destination — exports plummeted by -93.6%, from €34.2 million to just €2.2 million. This is a direct consequence of EU sanctions imposed after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Russia was the EU's fifth-largest export market in 2015; by 2025, it had become negligible.

Other notable export partner developments:

Export Partner 2015 (€) 2025 (€) Change
United Kingdom 113,341,096 93,611,515 -17.4%
United States 83,231,613 111,087,060 +33.5%
Türkiye 22,600,075 52,664,032 +133.0%
Algeria 12,790,792 17,349,422 +35.6%
Ukraine 16,090,549 8,650,350 -46.2%
Russian Federation 34,208,004 2,186,032 -93.6%

The United States overtook the United Kingdom as the EU's top export destination by value (€111.1M vs. €93.6M in 2025). Türkiye more than doubled as an export destination, possibly reflecting its role as a processing hub or re-export platform. The UK's decline (-17.4%) likely reflects post-Brexit friction and the UK developing its own supply chains.

Export concentration remained low while import sources diversified

The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for export concentration by value was already low in 2015 (847) and declined marginally to 803 by 2025 (-5.2%), indicating a well-diversified export base. Import concentration, while higher, also declined from 2,136 to 1,702 (-20.3%), signifying meaningful diversification of import sources — even as China's share grew, other suppliers (Korea, Japan, UK) also expanded, preventing excessive dependence on any single origin.

The EU's largest member states drove both import and export flows

Among EU reporters, Germany dominated both trade flows:

  • Exports: Germany accounted for €203.3M in 2025 (roughly one-third of total EU exports), followed by France (€82.3M), Spain (€71.2M), and the Netherlands (€54.8M).
  • Imports: Germany led with €72.0M, but the most striking growth came from Poland (+422.8%), France (+670.8%), and Spain (+97.9%).

The surge in Polish imports is notable and may be linked to Poland's growing role as a manufacturing and packaging hub within the EU, as well as the shift in automotive and consumer-goods supply chains toward Central Europe.


III. Production, Specialisation, and Supply-Side Shocks

EU domestic production expanded, but not enough to offset import growth

According to production data, EU production of backed aluminium foil grew from 943,031 tonnes in 2015 to an estimated 1,050,000 tonnes in 2025 (+11.3% in quantity). Production value rose more steeply, from €3.76 billion to €5.00 billion (+33.1%), reflecting higher input costs (notably energy and raw aluminium prices) and/or a shift toward higher-value product segments.

Production Metric 2015 2025 Change
Quantity (kg) 943,031,167 1,050,000,000 +11.3%
Value (€) 3,755,223,183 5,000,000,000 +33.1%

Despite this expansion, the growth in production (+11.3%) lagged far behind the growth in imports (+94.8% in volume), indicating that incremental demand was increasingly met by foreign suppliers.

Specialisation patterns reveal a two-speed EU

Analysis of revealed comparative advantage (RCA) across EU member states in 2025 shows pronounced specialisation in southern and western Europe:

Most Specialised RSCA RCA Production Share
Greece 0.618 4.24 2.9%
France 0.382 2.24 17.5%
Spain 0.313 1.91 11.1%
Croatia 0.304 1.87 0.8%
Denmark 0.265 1.72 3.0%
Least Specialised RSCA RCA Production Share
Austria -0.999 0.000 0.0%
Cyprus -0.999 0.001 0.0%
Ireland -0.971 0.015 0.0%
Hungary -0.968 0.016 0.0%
Romania -0.771 0.129 0.2%

Greece, despite its small overall share of EU production, exhibited the highest RCA (4.24), suggesting a strong niche specialisation. France and Spain together accounted for nearly 29% of production and demonstrated robust comparative advantages. Conversely, Austria, Ireland, and several Central/Eastern European states were net importers with virtually no export specialisation in this product.

Supply shocks centred on 2022, linked to the Ukraine conflict

The volatility and shock analysis detected significant price shocks in 2022, coinciding with the energy crisis and the Russia–Ukraine war:

Shock Event Type Flow Year Price Shift Abnormality Score
Ukraine price exports 2022 +37.4% 157.6
Armenia price exports 2022 +33.8% 138.4
Mexico price exports 2022 +29.0% 104.3

The abnormality scores (how far the observed shift deviates from historical norms) were extremely elevated — 157.6 for Ukraine, 138.4 for Armenia, and 104.3 for Mexico — indicating that these were genuine outliers rather than normal fluctuations. These shocks reflect the broader aluminium price spike of 2022, driven by surging energy costs in Europe (aluminium smelting is highly energy-intensive) and supply disruptions linked to sanctions on Russian aluminium.

Import-side volatility was highest for Japan (coefficient of variation = 1.05) and Korea (CV = 0.91), both of which saw erratic trade patterns — likely reflecting opportunistic spot-market purchases or one-off contracts rather than stable long-term supply relationships.

Product segment data reveal a differentiated market from 2022 onward

Segment-level data became available from 2022, enabling a more granular view of the product mix:

Exports by segment (2025):

Segment Code Volume (t) Value (€) Price (€/t)
Ultra-thin foil (<0.021 mm) 76072010 42,617 288,396,794 6,766
Standard foil (0.021–0.2 mm) 76072099 32,934 303,605,723 9,218
Composite panels 76072091 1,536 11,107,732 7,233

Imports by segment (2025):

Segment Code Volume (t) Value (€) Price (€/t)
Ultra-thin foil (<0.021 mm) 76072010 10,458 67,035,096 6,409
Standard foil (0.021–0.2 mm) 76072099 27,642 170,426,747 6,165
Composite panels 76072091 24,111 59,330,398 2,461

Several observations stand out:

  • Ultra-thin foil (76072010) remains the largest export segment by volume (42,617 t), though it has declined from 65,896 t in 2015. It is also the highest-volume import segment, with volumes rising from 8,217 t to 10,458 t.
  • Standard foil (76072099) commands the highest export price (€9,218/t vs. €6,766/t for ultra-thin), suggesting the EU retains a competitive advantage in thicker, technically demanding applications.
  • Aluminium composite panels (76072091) — a newly tracked segment — represent a significant import category by volume (24,111 t) but at very low unit prices (€2,461/t), consistent with commoditised construction/cladding panels. The EU exported only 1,536 t of these panels, indicating near-total import dependence in this sub-category.

Conclusion

The EU's trade in backed aluminium foil (CN 760720) over 2015–2025 tells a story of structural transformation under geopolitical stress. The EU remained a net exporter throughout, but its competitive position eroded meaningfully: the trade surplus shrank by a third, export volumes fell by nearly a third, and imports nearly doubled. Rising export prices partially masked volume losses, suggesting the EU is retreating toward higher-value niches while ceding standard-grade market share to Asian and Turkish competitors.

China's emergence as the dominant import growth driver — alongside rapid gains from Korea and Japan — raises strategic questions about supply-chain concentration, particularly as EU policymakers pursue "strategic autonomy" in critical materials. The near-total loss of the Russian export market, while geopolitically intentional, removed €32 million in annual export revenue that has not been fully replaced.

The 2022 energy crisis left a clear imprint through abnormal price shocks across multiple export partners, reminding market participants of the EU aluminium industry's vulnerability to energy-cost volatility. Looking ahead, the intersection of EU carbon-border adjustment mechanisms, anti-dumping enforcement, and the ongoing reconfiguration of global aluminium supply chains will shape the next phase of this market's evolution.

Generated on 2026-08-07. Figures reflect Eurostat data at generation time and do not include later revisions.

Auto-generated: this report is meant to accelerate, but not to replace, human analysis.

If you need advice on European trade policy, or representation for your interests in Brussels, please contact me at support@tradedashboard.eu. You can find my CV at this address.