Market evolution: Shelled hazelnuts (CN 080222) — 2015–2025
Introduction
This report analyses the European Union's trade in shelled hazelnuts (customs code 080222) over the decade from 2015 to 2025. The EU is a major global player in this market, both as a significant consumer and processor and as a producer. The period has been characterized by substantial shifts in trade flows, evolving supplier relationships, and a persistent structural reliance on external sources. The following sections dissect the primary dynamics observed in the general trade overview, market structure, and trade vulnerability.
1. A Diversifying Import Base Against a Backdrop of Growing Domestic Demand
The EU's import profile for shelled hazelnuts has undergone significant transformation, moving away from near-total reliance on a single supplier while overall volumes have increased to meet consumption.
Total imports grew in volume while the trade deficit widened.
Between 2015 and 2025, the quantity of shelled hazelnut imports into the EU rose from 120,423 tonnes to 149,967 tonnes, an increase of 24.5%. In value terms, imports grew more modestly from €1.20 billion to €1.27 billion (+5.5%), as the average import price fell by 15.3% from €9,966 per tonne to €8,442 per tonne. This growth in import volume, coupled with a 53.1% collapse in export quantity (from 4,107 to 1,928 tonnes), caused the EU's trade deficit in this product to expand from -€1.16 billion to -€1.25 billion.
Turkey's dominant share eroded as new suppliers emerged.
The most striking change has been the diversification of the EU's import sources. Turkey, historically the world's largest producer, saw its share of EU imports fall from 82% (€987M) in 2015 to 59% (€743M) in 2025. This decline in share occurred despite Turkey remaining the largest single partner. The vacated space was filled by a dramatic surge in shipments from Chile (from €13M to €288M) and the United States (from €2M to €80M). The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for import concentration by value fell by 41%, confirming this move towards a more diversified supplier base.
| Import Partner (by Value) | 2015 (€ M) | 2025 (€ M) | Share 2015 | Share 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Türkiye | 986.7 | 743.2 | 82.2% | 58.7% | -24.7% |
| Chile | 12.6 | 288.2 | 1.1% | 22.8% | +2186.7% |
| Georgia | 130.2 | 83.0 | 10.8% | 6.6% | -36.3% |
| United States | 1.9 | 80.5 | 0.2% | 6.4% | +4135.5% |
| Total EU Imports | 1200.2 | 1266.0 | 100% | 100% | +5.5% |
Export markets contracted sharply, especially in Europe.
EU re-exports of shelled hazelnuts declined dramatically in both value (-59.5%) and quantity (-53.1%). The United Kingdom, once the largest export destination, saw its imports from the EU collapse by 87% in value. Switzerland and other traditional markets also contracted. This suggests a competitive squeeze on EU processors or a shift in global trade patterns, possibly with more direct shipments from origin countries to final consumers.
2. Rising EU Production Fails to Offset Deep-Seated Import Dependency
While the EU's own hazelnut production has expanded significantly, its structural role in the market is that of a large-scale net importer, with domestic output catering primarily to a specialized, high-value segment.
Production volumes nearly doubled, but value stagnated.
EU production of shelled hazelnuts increased by 91.1% in volume, from 314,000 tonnes in 2015 to 600,000 tonnes in 2025. However, production value remained relatively flat at around €1 billion, indicating that the growth in volume was achieved without a proportional increase in revenue, pointing to possible price pressure or the production of lower-value varieties.
Specialization is geographically concentrated within the EU.
The EU's production is not uniform; it is highly specialized in a few key member states. Italy is by far the most specialized producer (Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage - RSCA of 0.77), accounting for over 61% of EU production volume. Bulgaria is the only other member with notable specialization. This geographic concentration means the EU's overall production capacity is tied to the harvest outcomes of a few regions.
Net import reliance remains structurally high.
Despite the production growth, the EU's net import reliance has remained stubbornly stable, hovering around 83% throughout the decade (83.1% in 2015, 83.8% in 2025). This indicates that domestic production growth has been roughly matched by growth in consumption, perpetuating the EU's status as a large net importer. The high trade intensity index (peaking at 93.6%) underscores how deeply integrated the EU hazelnut market is into global trade flows.
3. Exposure to Volatile Supply Chains and Price Shocks
The EU's trade pattern reveals significant vulnerabilities stemming from price volatility in key export markets and reliance on suppliers with unpredictable trade flows.
Import volatility is highest from the United States and Chile.
While imports from Turkey are relatively stable (Coefficient of Variation, CV, of 0.12), flows from newer partners are far more volatile. The CV for imports from the United States is exceptionally high at 1.66, and for Chile it is 0.59. This means that while diversification reduces reliance on a single country, it introduces a different kind of risk from suppliers whose shipments can vary dramatically from year to year.
Export markets experienced acute price shocks.
An analysis of trade shocks detected notable price anomalies in the EU's exports. The most significant was a 112.4% price increase for exports to the United States in 2021 (abnormality score of 7.2). A similar, though smaller, price shock occurred for exports to Azerbaijan in 2019. These events highlight the potential for sudden disruptions or extreme price movements in the EU's export relationships.
Internal market dynamics show resilience, with production insulating some member states.
The most specialized producing countries, like Italy and Bulgaria, show positive RSCA values, indicating a competitive advantage. Conversely, many member states (e.g., Ireland, Finland, Estonia) show extreme negative specialization, meaning they are almost purely consumers in this market. This internal division of labor allows the EU to function as an integrated market, where producing members supply processing and consumption needs across the bloc, partially insulating less specialized members from direct global trade shocks.
Conclusion
Over the 2015-2025 period, the EU shelled hazelnut market has been defined by a persistent paradox: robust growth in both domestic production and import volumes, coupled with an unwavering structural dependency on external suppliers. The most critical development has been the strategic diversification away from Turkish dominance towards suppliers in Chile and the United States, a move that mitigates single-source risk but introduces new forms of volatility. This diversification has occurred alongside a near-doubling of EU production, which remains geographically concentrated in Italy and Bulgaria. Ultimately, the EU's position is that of a massive, consumption-driven market whose import reliance (consistently around 83% of apparent consumption) has proven resistant to change, making it perpetually sensitive to global supply shocks and price fluctuations in the hazelnut trade.