Explore live data

Market evolution: Naphtha (CN 27101211) — 2015–2025

Introduction

This report analyzes the trade evolution of naphtha (CN code 27101211) by the European Union with non-EU countries from 2015 to 2025. The period witnessed a dramatic contraction in the EU's external naphtha trade, characterized by a severe decline in both import and export volumes. The analysis reveals a market profoundly reshaped by geopolitical upheaval, leading to a rapid and forced diversification of supply sources away from historical dominance.

The Great Contraction: A Decade of Shrinking Trade Flows

The EU's external naphtha market experienced a substantial downturn over the analyzed period, with trade volumes and values declining sharply from their 2015 levels.

A Severe and Symmetrical Decline in Import and Export Volumes

Both the EU's imports and exports of naphtha collapsed between 2015 and 2025. Import volume fell by 61.8%, from 11.32 million tonnes to 4.33 million tonnes, while the import value halved (a 50.0% decrease) to EUR 2.41 billion. The contraction was even more pronounced on the export side, with volume and value both plummeting by 96.8% to just 49,910 tonnes and EUR 21.4 million, respectively. This indicates a fundamental reduction in the EU's role as a naphtha trader on the global stage.

The Trade Balance and Price Dynamics

The persistent EU trade deficit in naphtha narrowed significantly, improving by 42.5% from -EUR 4.16 billion in 2015 to -EUR 2.39 billion in 2025. This improvement was not due to increased competitiveness but rather to the steeper decline in import volumes. Notably, import unit prices rose by 30.8% (from EUR 426.6/t to EUR 558.0/t) while export prices remained relatively stable, suggesting increased cost pressures for EU importers and a potential squeeze on downstream industries.

For a detailed visualization of these trends, refer to the General Overview trade section.

Geopolitical Shock and Supplier Diversification

The most significant structural shift in the EU's naphtha market was the radical realignment of its import sources, driven almost entirely by geopolitical events.

The Pre-2024 Dominance and Sudden Collapse of Russian Supply

Until the recent past, the Russian Federation was the EU's overwhelmingly dominant naphtha supplier, accounting for over 60% of import value in 2015 (EUR 2.88 billion). This share persisted until 2024 when a catastrophic supply shock occurred: imports from Russia plunged by 97.7% in value, falling to EUR 239 million. This event, an abnormal shift flagged in the data, is directly linked to EU sanctions targeting Russian energy exports following the invasion of Ukraine. The top shock events data confirms this as the market's defining shock.

The Search for Alternative Suppliers: A Mixed Picture

Following the loss of Russian volumes, the EU scrambled to diversify. The table below shows the performance of the top seven partners in 2025 compared to 2015.

Partner 2015 Value (EUR M) 2025 Value (EUR M) Change (%)
Russian Federation 2,880 239 -91.7
Algeria 802 845 5.3
Norway 101 416 312.0
Türkiye 18 244 1,263.7
United States 49 159 221.3
United Kingdom 306 238 -22.2
Libya 120 179 49.8

Source: Top Partners by Value

While Norway, Türkiye, and the United States significantly increased their exports to the EU, these gains were insufficient to offset the loss from Russia. Algeria and Libya maintained or grew their volumes, highlighting the increased importance of North African suppliers. This diversification reduced the concentration of import sources, as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), which fell by 55.4% from 4,136 to 1,846, moving the market from a highly concentrated to a moderately concentrated structure.

Internal Market Restructuring and Volatility

The external contraction and supply shift had profound effects on the internal structure and stability of the EU's naphtha market.

Shifting Centres of Gravity Within the EU

The decline in trade was not uniform across EU Member States. Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands—historically major importers due to their refining and petrochemical hubs—saw their import values fall by 66.2%, 32.4%, and 67.5% respectively. On the export side, Italy and Greece, former significant exporters, experienced near-total collapses (-97.7% and -95.0%). Specialization data for 2025 indicates that Belgium and Italy remain the most specialized in this product, but their relative positions are within a much smaller overall market.

Increased Price Volatility and Export Market Fragility

Volatility analysis reveals that the EU's export markets were significantly more unstable than its import sources, with many partner relationships exhibiting a coefficient of variation above 1. This points to opportunistic or niche trade in exports. A notable price shock occurred in EU exports to Türkiye in 2022, with prices surging by 782.1%, contributing to overall market instability. The concentration of exports also increased dramatically (HHI +119.8%), suggesting that remaining EU exports became dependent on fewer, more volatile partners, as detailed in the concentration data.

Conclusion

The EU's naphtha trade with the world from 2015 to 2025 tells a story of dramatic contraction and forced adaptation. The market is smaller, more expensive for imports, and virtually absent in exports. The single most important driver was the geopolitical severance from Russia, which acted as a massive supply shock in 2024. This crisis accelerated a diversification towards suppliers in North America, North Africa, and Europe (Norway, Türkiye), but could not prevent an overall decline in trade volume. Internally, the market has become more concentrated in its remaining export flows and remains specialized in traditional refining hubs, albeit at a much-reduced scale. The period underscores the vulnerability of EU energy-intensive industries to geopolitical volatility and the profound impact of sanctions on commodity flows.

Generated on 2026-08-08. Figures reflect Eurostat data at generation time and do not include later revisions.

Auto-generated: this report is meant to accelerate, but not to replace, human analysis.

If you need advice on European trade policy, or representation for your interests in Brussels, please contact me at support@tradedashboard.eu. You can find my CV at this address.