Market evolution: Acrylic polymers (CN 390690) — 2015–2025
Introduction
CN 390690 is a residual customs heading covering acrylic polymers in primary forms, excluding poly(methyl methacrylate). It bundles several specialised copolymers used in adhesives, coatings, paints, textiles, and industrial applications. Subheading 39069090 — the broad catch-all for acrylic polymers not elsewhere specified — accounts for over 97% of both import and export volumes, making it the overwhelmingly dominant product within this code.
Over the 2015–2025 period, EU trade in this category was shaped by three converging forces: a striking divergence between booming domestic production and shrinking export volumes, a dramatic reconfiguration of trading partners driven by geopolitical upheaval, and a sustained increase in export unit values that outpaced import price trends. Together, these dynamics paint a picture of a sector transitioning from volume-driven export growth toward higher-value, more domestically oriented production — against a backdrop of shifting global supply chains and post-sanctions realignment.
1. Rising Production and a Diverging Trade Trajectory
EU domestic production surged while export volumes contracted
EU production of acrylic polymers grew from 2.27 billion kg to 3.79 billion kg between 2015 and 2025, a remarkable 66.7% increase in volume. Over the same period, however, export volumes fell by 15.1%, from 905,377 tonnes to 768,608 tonnes. This divergence points to a structural shift: a growing share of EU output is being absorbed by domestic downstream industries rather than shipped abroad. The EU's export propensity — exports as a share of production — edged up from 39.6% to 41.2%, but this masks the fact that the absolute tonnage leaving the bloc has declined even as the production base expanded substantially. Production volumes
Import volumes grew by a third, narrowing the trade surplus
While exports shrank in tonnage, imports moved in the opposite direction. Import volumes rose from 331,682 tonnes to 439,649 tonnes (+32.6%), and import values climbed from €732 million to €984 million (+34.5%). The EU's trade surplus, though still substantial at €1.02 billion in 2025, narrowed by 12.2% from its 2015 level of €1.17 billion. The surplus peaked at an estimated €1.42 billion during the 2022 price spike before retreating, suggesting that the narrowing trend has accelerated in recent years. Trade overview
Export prices rose sharply while import prices remained largely flat
A striking feature of the decade is the divergent price trajectory between exports and imports:
| Indicator | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Export value (€ billion) | 1.90 | 2.01 | +5.8% |
| Export volume (thousand tonnes) | 905 | 769 | −15.1% |
| Export unit value (€/tonne) | 2,097 | 2,613 | +24.6% |
| Import value (€ million) | 732 | 984 | +34.5% |
| Import volume (thousand tonnes) | 332 | 440 | +32.6% |
| Import unit value (€/tonne) | 2,206 | 2,238 | +1.5% |
| Trade balance (€ billion) | 1.17 | 1.02 | −12.2% |
Export unit values climbed 24.6% to €2,613/tonne while import prices rose just 1.5% to €2,238/tonne. By 2025, EU exports commanded a 16.7% price premium over imports. This is consistent with the EU specialising in higher-value-added, niche acrylic copolymers while importing more commoditised grades — a pattern reinforced by rising European energy costs that were passed through into export prices. Trade overview
2. The Geopolitical Remapping of EU Acrylic Polymer Trade
Sanctions erased Russia as an export destination
The most dramatic single-country shift over the decade was the collapse of EU exports to Russia. From €142 million in 2015, exports fell to a mere €31,000 in 2025 — effectively a complete cessation of trade. Russia had been the EU's fourth-largest export market; its removal following successive rounds of EU sanctions from 2022 onward forced EU producers to redirect volumes to other destinations. A severe price shock was detected in 2023, with unit values spiking by 517%, reflecting the near-total collapse of volumes and the residual nature of the remaining trade. By-country partners
Asian suppliers gained significant ground as import sources diversified
The EU's import base became meaningfully less concentrated over the period. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for import value fell from 1,817 to 1,565 (−13.9%), indicating a move toward a more diversified supplier portfolio. The largest shifts among the top seven import partners were:
| Import Partner | 2015 (€M) | 2025 (€M) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 137 | 229 | +67.3% |
| China | 29 | 73 | +154.5% |
| Türkiye | 47 | 96 | +104.8% |
| Taiwan | 5 | 15 | +182.8% |
| United States | 207 | 182 | −12.1% |
| Japan | 141 | 176 | +25.0% |
| Korea, Republic of | 109 | 138 | +26.5% |
China (+154.5%) and Taiwan (+182.8%) saw the fastest growth, reflecting the expansion of Asian acrylic polymer capacity and competitive pricing. The UK's 67.3% increase likely reflects post-Brexit trade rerouting, as flows that were previously intra-EU now appear as extra-EU imports. Türkiye's import growth of 104.8% signals its emergence as a competitive regional producer. By-country partners
The UK remains the primary export partner, but the export map is shifting
EU exports to the UK grew from €276 million to €323 million (+17.2%), maintaining its position as the top destination. Türkiye (+38.5% to €184 million) and China (+35.5% to €199 million) expanded more rapidly. The United States remained a stable market at €249 million (+3.0%). Export concentration rose modestly (HHI from 637 to 706, +10.8%), a side effect of Russia's disappearance rather than a deliberate consolidation. France and Belgium stand out as the EU's most specialised exporters, with revealed symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) scores of 0.44 and 0.40 respectively, while Germany dominates in absolute volume at €682 million in exports. By-country partners · Specialisation
Southern European members drove the import surge
Within the EU, the import growth was concentrated in southern member states. Italy's imports rose 113.9% (from €46 million to €98 million), France's surged 135.2% (from €40 million to €94 million), and Spain's nearly doubled at +99.5% (from €26 million to €53 million). Meanwhile, Germany — the largest EU importer in 2015 at €231 million — saw its imports decline 28.6% to €165 million. This geographic rebalancing suggests growing downstream demand for acrylic polymers in southern Europe's coatings, construction, and packaging sectors. By-country reporters
3. Price Escalation, Shock Events, and Shifting Vulnerabilities
The 2022 energy crisis marked a structural price inflection
Both export and import prices peaked in 2022, with exports reaching an estimated €2,849/tonne and imports €2,714/tonne. This spike reflected the pass-through of elevated European natural gas costs — a critical input for acrylic polymer production — combined with post-pandemic supply-chain disruptions. By 2025, import prices had largely retraced to €2,238/tonne, but export prices remained elevated at €2,613/tonne. The persistence of higher export prices suggests that EU producers have retained pricing power in specialised segments, or that energy cost structures have permanently shifted upward.
Detected shock events reveal concentration risks in key partnerships
The volatility analysis identified three significant price shock events:
| Partner | Flow | Year | Abnormality Score | Price Shift | Value Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | Exports | 2022 | 54.6 | +42.4% | 2.4% |
| Russian Federation | Exports | 2023 | 43.3 | +517.0% | 6.9% |
| Japan | Imports | 2022 | 17.9 | +42.8% | 30.1% |
The Russia shock is a sanctions artefact — the near-total trade collapse left residual transactions at extreme per-unit prices. The Japan import shock is more structurally significant: Japan accounts for 30.1% of EU import value in this product category, and a 42.8% price spike in 2022 demonstrates the vulnerability of relying on a single major Asian supplier during a period of global energy and logistics stress. Supply shocks
Newer import partners exhibit higher trade volatility
Coefficient of variation (CV) analysis across import partners reveals a clear pattern: newer or smaller suppliers display far greater trade instability than established ones.
| Import Partner | CV | Character |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 0.82 | Highly volatile |
| India | 0.73 | Highly volatile |
| Taiwan | 0.50 | Volatile |
| China | 0.41 | Moderately volatile |
| Türkiye | 0.32 | Moderate |
| United States | 0.22 | Stable |
| Japan | 0.20 | Stable |
| United Kingdom | 0.15 | Stable |
| Switzerland | 0.15 | Stable |
This gradient is consistent with emerging supply relationships that are still scaling and remain more sensitive to demand swings, logistics disruptions, or currency movements. As these newer partners grow in importance — China and Taiwan's import shares have risen sharply — their volatility becomes a more material factor for EU supply-chain planning. Volatility
The EU retains a strong net export position despite evolving vulnerabilities
The EU's net import reliance remained negative throughout the period (−19.8% in 2015, −26.8% in 2025), confirming the EU's status as a consistent net exporter. The value reached its most negative point (−47.7%) during the 2022 price peak, before partially retracing. Trade intensity — total trade as a share of production — held steady at approximately 51%, while export propensity edged up from 39.6% to 41.2%. These indicators suggest that while the EU's competitive position remains intact, the margin of advantage has narrowed as import penetration grows and the trade surplus contracts. Trade intensity · Export propensity
Conclusion
The EU's trade in acrylic polymers (CN 390690) over 2015–2025 tells a story of profound structural change beneath an apparently stable surface. Export values grew modestly (+5.8%), but this masks a 15.1% decline in tonnage, offset entirely by a 24.6% increase in unit values. Meanwhile, imports surged in both volume (+32.6%) and value (+34.5%), narrowing the trade surplus by 12.2%. EU production expanded by 66.7% in volume, pointing to a rapidly growing domestic market that is absorbing an increasing share of output.
Geopolitically, the erasure of Russia as an export destination and the rise of Asian suppliers — particularly China, Taiwan, and Türkiye — have fundamentally redrawn the trade map. Import source diversification is underway (HHI down 13.9%), but concentration risks persist among key Asian partners, as the 2022 Japan price shock demonstrated.
The EU's competitive position remains robust: it is a net exporter throughout the period, export prices command a growing premium over imports, and France and Belgium maintain strong specialisation advantages. However, the convergence of rising Asian capacity, volatile energy costs, and evolving regulatory pressures under the EU Green Deal will test the resilience of this position in the years ahead. Monitoring the balance between domestic absorption and export orientation — and the volatility profiles of newer supplier relationships — will be critical for anticipating future market dynamics.