Market evolution: Women's synthetic jackets (CN 62043390) — 2015–2025
Introduction
This report analyses the trade dynamics of Women's or girls' jackets and blazers of synthetic fibres (CN 62043390) within the European Union over the period 2015–2025. The decade was marked by a dramatic contraction of domestic production, a widening trade deficit, a significant diversification of sourcing away from China toward North Africa and Southeast Asia, and a repositioning of EU exports toward higher-value segments. Three main structural shifts define this period and are examined in the sections below.
1. Import Volume Growth and the Erosion of Domestic Production
EU production of women's synthetic jackets and blazers collapsed over the decade, while imports surged to fill the gap. This dynamic is the central story of the period.
Production fell by more than half in volume terms
EU production of women's synthetic jackets declined from 51.6 million items (2015) to 21.5 million items (2025), a drop of 58.3%. In value terms, output fell from €1.27 billion to €773 million (−39.3%). The lowest point in volume was reached in 2020 (15.4 million items), coinciding with pandemic-related disruptions, after which a partial recovery occurred. Nevertheless, 2025 production remained far below pre-2020 levels, confirming a structural rather than cyclical decline.
Imports compensated and then exceeded lost domestic output
Imports in volume grew from 19,418 tonnes to 30,124 tonnes (+55.1%), and from 37.7 million items to 48.4 million items (+28.4%). The value of imports rose from €455 million to €688 million (+51.2%). The EU's net import reliance surged from just 4.7% in 2015 to 21.9% in 2025 — a 368.4% increase — reflecting the growing dependency on third-country suppliers to meet EU demand.
The unit-price gap between imports and exports widened sharply
A notable divergence in pricing behaviour emerged. While import unit values per piece rose modestly from €12.07 to €14.21 (+17.7%), export unit values per piece jumped from €28.90 to €43.53 (+50.6%). EU exports thus commanded roughly three times the per-piece price of imports in 2025, up from about 2.4 times in 2015. This pattern is consistent with a shift in EU production toward premium or higher-margin segments, while lower-cost sourcing fills the mass market.
| Indicator | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU production (million items) | 51.6 | 21.5 | −58.3% |
| Imports (million items) | 37.7 | 48.4 | +28.4% |
| Imports value (€ million) | 455 | 688 | +51.2% |
| Net import reliance (%) | 4.7 | 21.9 | +368.4% |
| Import price (€/p/st) | 12.07 | 14.21 | +17.7% |
| Export price (€/p/st) | 28.90 | 43.53 | +50.6% |
2. Supply Chain Diversification: From China-Centric to Multi-Source Sourcing
The import side of the market underwent a profound geographic restructuring, with several low-cost origins gaining ground at the expense of historical concentration.
China remained dominant but lost relative share
China was the largest single supplier throughout the period, with imports rising from €251 million to €299 million (+19.3%). However, this growth was modest compared to the surge in total imports, meaning China's share of the import market eroded. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for imports by value fell from 3,324 (2015) to 2,361 (2025), a decline of 29.0%, confirming a clear trend toward less concentrated sourcing.
Morocco emerged as the second-largest supplier
Morocco's import value grew from €42 million to €105 million (+149.2%), more than doubling its share. This dramatic rise is consistent with the EU-Morocco Association Agreement and the country's established role in fast-fashion supply chains, offering proximity, competitive labour costs, and preferential tariff access to the EU single market.
Southeast Asian origins saw explosive — but volatile — growth
Several Southeast Asian countries experienced extraordinary growth from very low starting points:
- Bangladesh: from €18.0 million to €49.6 million (+175.9%)
- Myanmar: from €1.2 million to €34.9 million (+2,782.3%)
- Cambodia: from €1.6 million to €47.7 million (+2,870.0%)
These three origins collectively grew from under €20 million in 2015 to over €132 million in 2025, representing a significant portion of the EU's growing import bill. However, their coefficients of variation were very high (Myanmar at 0.79, Cambodia at 0.86), indicating that these supply relationships remain relatively recent and potentially unstable.
Import price shocks flagged supply-side instability
Price shock detection identified two significant events:
- Morocco (2021): a price shock with an abnormality score of 20.4 and a −9.3% price shift, capturing 19% of import value — likely linked to post-pandemic sourcing adjustments.
- China (2022): a price shock with an abnormality of 5.7 and a +16.5% price shift, representing 57.5% of import value — potentially reflecting supply-chain cost inflation in the wake of zero-COVID policies and logistics disruptions.
| Top Import Origins | 2015 (€M) | 2025 (€M) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 250.9 | 299.5 | +19.3% |
| Morocco | 42.2 | 105.1 | +149.2% |
| Bangladesh | 18.0 | 49.6 | +175.9% |
| Myanmar | 1.2 | 34.9 | +2,782.3% |
| Cambodia | 1.6 | 47.7 | +2,870.0% |
| Türkiye | 20.2 | 36.0 | +78.0% |
| Viet Nam | 48.1 | 52.3 | +8.7% |
3. EU Export Repositioning: Higher Values, Shifting Destinations
While imports grew in volume, the EU's export trajectory told a qualitatively different story — one of repositioning toward higher-value products and shifting destination markets.
Export values grew much faster than volumes
EU exports rose from €163 million to €258 million (+58.3% in value), but only from 2,870 tonnes to 3,440 tonnes (+19.9% in weight). The number of items exported barely changed (from 5.64 million to 5.92 million, +5.1%). This means that the price per tonne increased by 32.0% (from €56,737 to €74,899), while the price per piece jumped 50.6% (from €28.90 to €43.53). EU exporters thus shipped roughly the same number of items at substantially higher prices, pointing to a shift upmarket.
Switzerland and the United States became the most dynamic destination markets
The UK remained the largest single export destination, but its import value from the EU actually declined slightly (from €48.6 million to €44.7 million, −8.0%). In contrast:
- Switzerland: from €25.4 million to €51.1 million (+100.9%)
- United States: from €13.2 million to €26.5 million (+100.6%)
- China: from €5.7 million to €16.2 million (+187.1%)
These three markets — all characterised by higher purchasing power — collectively grew from €44.3 million to €93.8 million, more than doubling their share of EU exports. This confirms the premium repositioning narrative.
Intra-EU exports were a strong growth driver
Within the EU Member States, France saw the most striking export growth (from €16.6 million to €65.7 million, +296.6%), followed by the Netherlands (+793.1%) and Poland (+865.0%). These surges likely reflect both genuine production increases and intra-EU distribution hub effects, where goods transit through logistics centres.
The trade deficit widened substantially
Despite export growth, the trade deficit expanded from −€292 million to −€430 million (−47.2%). This means the EU's export gains, while real in unit-value terms, were insufficient to offset the surge in import expenditure driven by rising volumes from lower-cost origins.
| Export Dimension | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Export value (€ million) | 162.9 | 257.9 | +58.3% |
| Export volume (tonnes) | 2,870 | 3,440 | +19.9% |
| Export items (million p/st) | 5.64 | 5.92 | +5.1% |
| Price per piece (€) | 28.90 | 43.53 | +50.6% |
| Trade balance (€ million) | −292.3 | −430.2 | −47.2% |
Conclusion
The EU market for women's synthetic jackets and blazers (CN 62043390) underwent a fundamental transformation between 2015 and 2025. Domestic production contracted by more than half in volume, making the EU increasingly reliant on imports, which grew in both value and mass. The sourcing landscape diversified markedly: while China remained the dominant supplier, its relative importance declined as Morocco, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Cambodia emerged as significant origins — though with notably higher trade volatility. On the export side, the EU repositioned its output toward higher-value destinations (Switzerland, the United States, China), shipping fewer items at substantially higher prices. This suggests a structural shift in the EU's role in the global value chain: moving from broad-based production toward specialised, premium segments while importing ever-larger volumes to serve the domestic mass market. The widening trade deficit (from −€292 million to −€430 million) and rising net import reliance (from 4.7% to 21.9%) confirm that this transformation has increased the EU's external dependency in this product category.