Market evolution: Milled rice (CN 100630) — 2015–2025
Introduction
This report examines the trade dynamics of semi-milled and wholly milled rice (CN 100630) for the European Union over the 2015–2025 period. The product scope covers a wide range of sub-segments, from parboiled long-grain rice to round-grain polished varieties, and represents a significant component of the EU's cereals trade. Over the decade, the EU milled rice market underwent a structural transformation: the bloc shifted from a near-balanced position to a markedly heavier import reliance, while export volumes contracted despite rising unit values. At the same time, the geographic profile of both supply and demand evolved substantially, and intra-EU specialisation patterns consolidated around a handful of producing member states.
1. A Deepening Structural Deficit: The EU's Growing Import Dependence
The trade balance shifted decisively towards a large and widening deficit
The most striking macro-level development over 2015–2025 is the dramatic deterioration of the EU's trade balance in milled rice. In 2015, the deficit stood at €191 million; by 2025 it had ballooned to €720 million — a nearly fourfold increase (trade overview).
| Metric | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Import value (€M) | 481.2 | 1,054.6 | +119.2% |
| Import quantity (kt) | 661.6 | 1,183.9 | +78.9% |
| Export value (€M) | 290.5 | 334.1 | +15.0% |
| Export quantity (kt) | 358.5 | 270.6 | −24.5% |
| Trade balance (€M) | −190.8 | −720.5 | −277.7% |
Imports nearly doubled in volume and more than doubled in value. Exports, meanwhile, managed only modest value growth (+15%) while their physical volume shrank by almost a quarter, indicating that the value gain was entirely price-driven.
Unit-price trends reveal asymmetric inflationary pressures
Import unit prices rose from €727/t to €891/t over the period (+22.5%), while export unit prices climbed from €810/t to €1,235/t (+52.4%). This divergence suggests that EU exporters increasingly targeted higher-value or niche segments (or that global cost inflation pushed up prices across the board), while the large volumes entering the EU were sourced at relatively moderate — though rising — prices. The sharp acceleration in export prices, particularly from 2021 onwards, likely reflects both global commodity price spikes and the EU's loss of lower-value bulk export competitiveness.
EU domestic production contracted in volume but surged in value
The EU's own milled rice production declined from 2.63 billion kg in 2015 to 2.10 billion kg in 2025 (−20.1%), yet its estimated value rose from €1.89 billion to €3.00 billion (+58.7%). This combination — falling output, rising value — implies a substantial increase in domestic producer prices, consistent with global food-price inflation observed post-2020. It also means that the EU's capacity to meet internal demand through domestic production was eroding over the decade, reinforcing the need for imports.
Net import reliance moved from near-zero to nearly one-fifth of apparent consumption
The net import reliance indicator shifted from −2.4% in 2015 (a slight net-export position) to 18.6% in 2025. Simultaneously, trade intensity (the share of trade in total apparent consumption) more than doubled from 14.6% to 35.0%, indicating that the EU milled rice market became significantly more open and exposed to international flows. Export propensity also rose (from 8.9% to 12.2%), but the salience analysis confirms that the dominant dynamic was import-side intensification.
2. Diversifying Supply Chains and a Reconfigured Intra-EU Landscape
Asian suppliers consolidated their dominance, but the portfolio diversified
Seven major import partners account for the bulk of EU milled rice imports. The table below shows the evolution of import values from these suppliers:
| Partner | 2015 (€M) | 2025 (€M) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cambodia | 157.7 | 236.1 | +49.7% |
| India | 59.1 | 208.1 | +252.0% |
| Thailand | 122.3 | 190.6 | +55.8% |
| Pakistan | 29.6 | 140.0 | +372.9% |
| Myanmar | 33.3 | 145.3 | +336.6% |
| Viet Nam | 9.3 | 62.4 | +568.7% |
| United States | 21.7 | 22.3 | +2.9% |
Cambodia remained the single largest supplier throughout the period, benefiting from the EU's "Everything But Arms" preferential trade arrangement. However, the most striking growth came from India, Pakistan, Myanmar, and Viet Nam — all of which saw import values multiply several times over. India's share rose from €59 million to €208 million, and Viet Nam's imports surged nearly sevenfold, though from a low base. The United States was the only partner showing near-stagnation (+2.9%), suggesting its role in the EU market is marginal and not growing.
The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for imports by value fell from 2,028 to 1,625 (−19.9%), confirming a meaningful reduction in supplier concentration. This diversification improves the EU's supply resilience, though the pool remains heavily weighted towards South and Southeast Asia.
Export destinations showed divergent trajectories, with the UK anchoring the market
On the export side, the United Kingdom absorbed over a third of all extra-EU milled rice exports throughout the period, with values relatively stable (€127M in 2015, €124M in 2025). Other notable shifts include:
- Switzerland grew from €19M to €35M (+84.9%), reflecting stable, high-value demand.
- Jordan experienced pronounced volatility, rising from €5M to €20M overall (+272%), with a peak of €47M.
- Syria and Lebanon saw dramatic declines (−66% and −81% respectively), consistent with prolonged conflict-driven trade disruption.
- Türkiye remained a significant but slightly declining market (€32M → €27M, −15%).
Export concentration also declined, with HHI falling from 2,188 to 1,704 (−22.1%), indicating that EU exporters gradually spread sales across more partners.
Inside the EU, Italy dominated exports while France and the Netherlands led imports
The intra-EU dimension reveals strong specialisation. Italy alone accounted for roughly half of all EU extra-EU milled rice exports (€143M in 2015, €168M in 2025), reflecting its large domestic rice sector (Po Valley production). Portugal emerged as a fast-growing exporter (from €9M to €39M, +339%), while France's export role collapsed (€11M → €2.5M, −77%).
On the import side, France remained the largest single importer (€132M → €204M), followed by the Netherlands (€56M → €174M, +209%) and Italy (€37M → €118M, +217%). The massive growth in Dutch and Italian imports likely reflects the role of Rotterdam and Italian ports as re-distribution hubs, as well as Italy's rising import needs for processing and re-export.
The specialisation analysis confirms Italy as the most specialised EU member state in milled rice (RSCA of 0.64, RCA of 4.58), followed by Bulgaria, Portugal, Belgium, and Greece. At the other end, Nordic and Baltic states show negligible specialisation, consistent with their climatic unsuitability for rice cultivation.
3. Price Shocks, Supply Volatility, and the Evolving Product Mix
Import price shocks hit the EU in 2022, led by Pakistan
The volatility and shock analysis identifies several notable disruptions:
| Shock | Year | Type | Flow | Price shift | Abnormality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 2022 | Price | Import | +29.9% | 882.4 |
| Thailand | 2018 | Price | Import | +20.8% | 3.9 |
| Syria | 2023 | Price | Export | +74.8% | 6.0 |
The Pakistan import price shock of 2022 stands out with an extreme abnormality score of 882.4, coinciding with the post-Ukraine-invasion global commodity price spike and severe flooding in Pakistan that disrupted rice supply. Given that Pakistan accounted for 16.5% of import value at the time, this shock transmitted significant cost pressure to EU buyers. The Thailand shock of 2018, though more moderate, affected a partner representing over 25% of import value, amplifying its market impact.
Supply volatility varied widely across partners
The coefficient of variation (CV) of import values ranged from 0.14 (Thailand, very stable) to 1.25 (China, highly erratic) (volatility bars). Among major suppliers, India (CV 0.42) and Pakistan (CV 0.47) showed moderate volatility, while Viet Nam (CV 0.65) was notably unstable. On the export side, Switzerland (CV 0.09) and Norway (CV 0.12) were the most predictable destinations, while Libya (CV 1.31) and Lebanon (CV 0.79) were highly volatile — a pattern consistent with geopolitical instability in those markets.
The import product mix shifted towards parboiled and round-grain varieties
The product segment breakdown reveals an important evolution in the composition of imports. The dominant sub-segment, wholly milled non-parboiled long-grain rice (CN 10063098), grew from 442,895 t to 741,279 t (+67%), consistently accounting for over 60% of import volume. However, other segments grew faster:
| Sub-segment | 2015 (t) | 2025 (t) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10063098 — Long grain (≥3), non-parboiled | 442,895 | 741,279 | +67.4% |
| 10063067 — Long grain (≥3), parboiled | 96,144 | 219,817 | +128.6% |
| 10063094 — Medium grain, non-parboiled | 37,116 | 75,983 | +104.7% |
| 10063092 — Round grain, non-parboiled | 5,042 | 34,008 | +574.5% |
| 10063096 — Long grain (2–3), non-parboiled | 33,532 | 16,095 | −52.0% |
| 10063065 — Long grain (2–3), parboiled | 18,188 | 38,147 | +109.7% |
| 10063027 — Semi-milled long grain (≥3), parboiled | 7,731 | 18,925 | +144.8% |
The most dramatic relative growth was in round-grain rice (+575%), a niche segment whose import volumes jumped from just over 5,000 t to 34,000 t, possibly reflecting rising demand for sushi-style and risotto-compatible rice. Parboiled long-grain rice (CN 10063067) more than doubled, potentially driven by growing demand from South Asian diaspora communities and food-service channels.
Export volumes declined across most sub-segments, with the product mix narrowing
On the export side, the picture was one of contraction. The two largest export sub-segments both lost volume:
| Sub-segment | 2015 (t) | 2025 (t) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10063096 — Long grain (2–3), non-parboiled | 113,767 | 106,527 | −6.4% |
| 10063098 — Long grain (≥3), non-parboiled | 75,036 | 38,416 | −48.8% |
| 10063092 — Round grain, non-parboiled | 61,420 | 30,612 | −50.2% |
| 10063067 — Long grain (≥3), parboiled | 50,236 | 34,284 | −31.7% |
| 10063094 — Medium grain, non-parboiled | 31,442 | 19,543 | −37.8% |
| 10063042 — Semi-milled round grain | 15,309 | 21,498 | +40.4% |
| 10063044 — Semi-milled medium grain | 40 | 11,143 | n/a (from near zero) |
Long-grain non-parboiled exports (CN 10063098) were nearly halved, and round-grain exports fell by half as well. Notable exceptions were semi-milled round grain (CN 10063042, +40%) and semi-milled medium grain (CN 10063044), which appeared from near-zero in 2015 to over 11,000 t by 2025. This suggests that EU processors increasingly exported semi-milled (unfinished) rice rather than wholly milled product, possibly to serve downstream processing in destination countries.
Conclusion
The EU milled rice market over 2015–2025 was defined by three overarching dynamics: a deepening structural trade deficit driven by surging imports, a geographic diversification of supply towards a broader set of Asian origins, and a notable shift in the product composition of both imports and exports. Rising import volumes (+79%) far outpaced export growth, pushing net import reliance to nearly 19% of apparent consumption. While supplier diversification (HHI declining by 20%) improved the EU's resilience to single-source disruptions, the concentration of supply in monsoon-dependent Asian economies remains a structural vulnerability — as illustrated by the severe 2022 Pakistan price shock. Domestically, production volumes declined even as values rose, reinforcing the EU's external dependency. Looking ahead, the combination of growing demand, shifting consumer preferences (towards round and parboiled varieties), and continued exposure to global commodity and climate shocks suggests that milled rice will remain a strategically sensitive product for the European Union.