Market evolution: Industrial monocarboxylic fatty acids (CN 38231990) — 2015–2025
Introduction
This report examines the evolution of EU trade in industrial monocarboxylic fatty acids and acid oils from refining (Combined Nomenclature code 38231990) over the period 2015–2025. This residual product category covers a range of fatty acids not elsewhere specified — notably excluding stearic acid, oleic acid, tall oil fatty acids, and distilled fatty acids — and is typically derived from vegetable oil processing, including palm, soybean, and rapeseed feedstocks.
The decade under review witnessed a profound structural transformation of the EU's position in this market. Domestic production contracted sharply, imports surged, and the EU's export capacity eroded — culminating in a net import reliance of over 94% by 2025. The following sections detail the main dynamics behind this shift, the geographic reorientation of trade flows, and the growing vulnerabilities that have accompanied these changes.
Full overview on the Trade Dashboard
1. From Producer to Importer: The EU's Structural Pivot
EU industrial production has halved in a decade
The most striking feature of this market over 2015–2025 is the sustained contraction of EU domestic production. According to Prodcom data (code 20.14.31.97), EU production of this category fell from 324,133 tonnes in the first observed year to 180,000 tonnes in the last — a decline of 44.5%. Production value followed a similar trajectory, declining from €118.8 million to €95.0 million (−20.0%), though the less steep value decline suggests that unit prices for domestically produced material have risen.
| Metric | First year | Last year | Min | Max | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production quantity (t) | 324,133 | 180,000 | 126,000 | 475,392 | −44.5% |
| Production value (€) | 118,822,956 | 95,000,000 | 88,886,524 | 331,485,475 | −20.0% |
Production volumes on the Trade Dashboard
The production peak — at roughly 475,000 tonnes at some point during the period — was far above current levels. The subsequent decline reflects a combination of factors: restructuring of the EU oleochemical industry, competition from lower-cost producers in Southeast Asia, rising feedstock costs, and tightening EU environmental regulations that have affected certain processing activities.
Imports have more than doubled in volume and tripled in value
Against this backdrop of declining domestic capacity, imports surged dramatically. EU imports of CN 38231990 grew from 246,362 tonnes (valued at €191.5 million) to 575,489 tonnes (valued at €585.0 million). This represents a volume increase of 133.6% and a value increase of 205.5%, with the steeper value growth reflecting the rise in unit import prices from €777/t to €1,017/t (+30.8%).
| Trade flow | Metric | First year | Last year | Min | Max | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imports | Value (€) | 191,463,528 | 585,015,935 | 184,443,918 | 718,585,728 | +205.5% |
| Quantity (t) | 246,362 | 575,489 | 246,362 | 693,823 | +133.6% | |
| Price (€/t) | 777 | 1,017 | 563 | 1,175 | +30.8% | |
| Exports | Value (€) | 47,272,396 | 29,625,491 | 27,315,122 | 75,257,509 | −37.3% |
| Quantity (t) | 49,629 | 24,492 | 24,492 | 87,278 | −50.7% | |
| Price (€/t) | 951 | 1,209 | 740 | 1,209 | +27.1% | |
| Balance | Value (€) | −144,191,131 | −555,390,444 | −643,328,219 | −134,054,169 | −285.2% |
Trade overview on the Trade Dashboard
The trade deficit has widened to over half a billion euros
The combination of surging imports and declining exports has caused the EU's trade deficit in this product to balloon from −€144 million to −€555 million — a deterioration of 285.2%. At its worst point, the deficit reached −€643 million. Meanwhile, net import reliance climbed from 64.0% to 94.2%, meaning that virtually all of the EU's consumption of these fatty acids is now met by foreign suppliers.
Net import reliance on the Trade Dashboard
This trajectory is consistent with a broader trend in EU basic chemicals and oleochemicals: the relocation of processing capacity to regions with cheaper feedstock access, particularly Southeast Asia (palm oil) and South America (soybean oil).
2. A New Geography of Supply: Tropical Origins and Emerging Trade Partners
Imports have shifted decisively toward Indonesia, Argentina, and Türkiye
The geographic composition of EU imports has evolved substantially. While Malaysia remained a major supplier throughout — growing from €52.3 million to €122.8 million (+134.8%) — the most dramatic increases came from three other origins:
| Import partner | First year (€) | Last year (€) | Max (€) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 9,890,914 | 144,984,454 | 254,463,210 | +1,365.8% |
| Argentina | 33,195,680 | 139,279,952 | 188,920,391 | +319.6% |
| Türkiye | 81,391 | 32,396,017 | 32,396,017 | +39,703.1% |
| India | 10,437,530 | 49,992,382 | 49,992,382 | +379.0% |
| Malaysia | 52,292,381 | 122,787,217 | 233,598,561 | +134.8% |
| Ukraine | 8,311,974 | 17,627,544 | 20,352,536 | +112.1% |
Top import partners on the Trade Dashboard
Indonesia's rise is particularly striking: from under €10 million in the first year to nearly €145 million, making it the EU's single largest import source by value in 2025. Indonesia is the world's largest palm oil producer, and the surge in imports likely reflects both the country's expanding oleochemical processing capacity and the EU's growing appetite for palm-derived fatty acids — even as the bloc has introduced sustainability regulations (such as the EU Deforestation Regulation) aimed at palm oil supply chains.
Argentina's trajectory — from €33 million to €139 million — points to the growing role of soybean-derived fatty acids in EU supply chains. Argentina is a major soybean oil exporter, and its oleochemical sector has expanded to serve European demand.
The Türkiye case is notable for its near-exponential growth from a negligible base (€81,000) to over €32 million, suggesting a rapid build-up of processing or re-export capacity in the country.
EU exports have collapsed to the United Kingdom but diversified elsewhere
On the export side, the dominant story is the dramatic decline in shipments to the United Kingdom — from €27.4 million to €4.4 million (−83.9%). The UK was by far the EU's largest export market in 2015, accounting for well over half of total exports by value. Its collapse is almost certainly linked to Brexit, which introduced customs formalations, regulatory divergence, and supply chain restructuring that reduced the UK's role as a destination for EU-origin fatty acids.
| Export partner | First year (€) | Last year (€) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27,425,020 | 4,410,795 | −83.9% |
| Switzerland | 3,475,428 | 8,099,148 | +133.0% |
| Norway | 818,589 | 4,903,065 | +499.0% |
| China | 318,296 | 3,072,253 | +865.2% |
| Türkiye | 2,429,596 | 510,418 | −79.0% |
| India | 840,763 | 633,335 | −24.7% |
Top export partners on the Trade Dashboard
Partially offsetting the UK decline, several smaller markets expanded:
- Switzerland more than doubled to €8.1 million, possibly benefiting from proximity and stable regulatory alignment.
- Norway grew nearly fivefold to €4.9 million.
- China surged from €0.3 million to €3.1 million (+865.2%), though from a very low base — possibly reflecting niche demand for EU-grade specialty fatty acids.
Export concentration has fallen sharply, reflecting the loss of UK dominance
The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for EU exports fell from 3,749 to 1,486 (−60.3% by value), a shift from a highly concentrated structure to a moderately diversified one. This is entirely explained by the collapse of the UK's share: in 2015, a single partner dominated EU exports; by 2025, no single partner held a comparable position. The Netherlands, with 59.4% of EU export value in 2025 and a revealed comparative advantage (RCA) of 4.10, emerged as the leading EU exporter — likely reflecting its role as a transhipment and processing hub.
Import-side HHI remained broadly stable at around 1,752, indicating moderate diversification of supply sources despite the surge in volumes.
Concentration analysis on the Trade Dashboard
Italy and Spain have become major import gateways
Among EU Member States, the redistribution of import flows has been dramatic:
| EU reporter | First year imports (€) | Last year imports (€) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | 6,569,896 | 249,255,695 | +3,693.9% |
| Netherlands | 89,099,389 | 167,134,033 | +87.6% |
| Spain | 6,328,513 | 57,104,162 | +802.3% |
| Germany | 39,355,397 | 8,232,548 | −79.1% |
| Sweden | 20,780,936 | 9,639,600 | −53.6% |
Top EU reporters on the Trade Dashboard
Italy saw the most dramatic transformation — from just €6.6 million to €249.3 million, making it the EU's largest import gateway by a wide margin. This likely reflects the expansion of Italy's oleochemical and biodiesel industries, which process imported fatty acids as feedstock. Spain followed a similar, though less extreme, pattern. Meanwhile, Germany and Sweden — both historically significant importers — saw their import values decline sharply, possibly reflecting industrial restructuring or shifts in sourcing patterns within the single market.
3. Rising Prices, Supply Shocks, and Deepening Vulnerability
Unit prices have risen across both imports and exports
Over the period, both import and export prices trended upward, reaching their maximum levels in the final year of the data window:
| Flow | First year price (€/t) | Last year price (€/t) | Max price (€/t) | Min price (€/t) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exports | 951 | 1,209 | 1,209 | 740 | +27.1% |
| Imports | 777 | 1,017 | 1,175 | 563 | +30.8% |
The fact that the import price maximum (€1,175/t) was reached before the final year — likely during the 2022 global commodity price spike — while the export price maximum (€1,209/t) was set in 2025, suggests divergent dynamics. Export prices may have been supported by the EU's shift toward higher-value, specialty-grade fatty acids as a shrinking production base focuses on premium segments.
Specific price shocks have punctuated the period
The volatility analysis identified two notable supply-side price shocks:
| Event | Partner | Year | Abnormality score | Price shift | Value share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine import price shock | Ukraine | 2021 | 21.7 | +82.8% | 3.8% |
| India import price shock | India | 2022 | 4.7 | +43.0% | 6.8% |
Supply shocks on the Trade Dashboard
The Ukraine shock in 2021 — with an abnormality score of 21.7 and a price increase of 82.8% — is particularly noteworthy. It pre-dates the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, suggesting that supply disruptions or speculative pressures were already affecting this trade flow a year before the conflict escalated. Ukraine is a significant producer of sunflower oil, and disruptions to its processing and export capacity would have rippled into fatty acid markets.
The India shock in 2022, with a +43% price shift, coincides with the broader global commodity price surge driven by the energy crisis and post-pandemic supply chain disruptions. India's decision to restrict certain edible oil exports during this period may also have contributed.
Several import partners show persistently high volatility
The coefficient of variation (CV) analysis reveals that some key suppliers exhibit significant year-to-year instability in their export values to the EU:
| Import partner | CV |
|---|---|
| Türkiye | 1.44 |
| India | 0.80 |
| Indonesia | 0.74 |
| Russian Federation | 0.67 |
| United Kingdom | 0.64 |
| Malaysia | 0.49 |
| Brazil | 1.21 |
Volatility analysis on the Trade Dashboard
Türkiye (CV of 1.44) and Brazil (CV of 1.21) stand out as the most volatile suppliers, consistent with their relatively recent entry into the EU market and possible exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and policy changes. Indonesia and India, despite their importance as suppliers, also show elevated volatility — a concern given that together they accounted for over a third of EU import value by 2025.
The EU's vulnerability profile has worsened across all metrics
The Autonomy & Vulnerability indicators paint a consistent picture of deepening exposure:
| Indicator | First year (%) | Last year (%) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net import reliance | 64.0 | 94.2 | +47.3% |
| Trade intensity | 75.3 | 97.4 | +29.4% |
| Export propensity | 25.2 | 54.0 | +114.8% |
Vulnerability metrics on the Trade Dashboard
- Net import reliance at 94.2% means the EU produces only a small fraction of what it consumes domestically.
- Trade intensity at 97.4% indicates that the EU market for this product is almost entirely internationalized — virtually all transactions involve cross-border flows.
- Export propensity at 54.0% means that over half of what the EU does produce is exported, suggesting that remaining domestic production is increasingly oriented toward niche or high-specification segments rather than serving the bulk market.
The most salient vulnerability indicator is export propensity (salience score of 118.8), which has more than doubled. This is a paradoxical signal: while the EU has become overwhelmingly dependent on imports for its consumption, its remaining producers are increasingly reliant on export markets — exposing them to foreign demand fluctuations even as the broader market depends on foreign supply.
Conclusion
Over the decade 2015–2025, the EU's market for industrial monocarboxylic fatty acids (CN 38231990) has undergone a fundamental transformation. Domestic production nearly halved, while imports more than doubled in volume and tripled in value, driving the trade deficit to over €555 million and net import reliance to 94.2%. The geographic centre of gravity of EU supply has shifted toward tropical origins — Indonesia, Argentina, and Malaysia — while on the export side, the loss of the United Kingdom as a dominant market (likely Brexit-related) has reshaped and diversified EU export patterns.
Rising unit prices, coupled with significant supply-side shocks (notably from Ukraine in 2021 and India in 2022) and persistently high volatility among key suppliers, underscore the fragility of the EU's current supply configuration. With domestic production concentrated in a shrinking number of Member States — led by the Netherlands and Italy — and with export propensity rising even as overall capacity declines, the EU faces a dual challenge: securing stable, affordable imports while maintaining a viable industrial base in an increasingly competitive global market.