Market evolution: Acrylic paints (CN 320820) — 2015–2025
Introduction
This report examines the EU's external trade in CN 320820 — paints and varnishes based on acrylic or vinyl polymers dispersed or dissolved in a non-aqueous medium, including solutions in volatile organic solvents containing more than 50% solvent by weight. Over the 2015–2025 period, the EU has consolidated its position as a major net exporter of these products. Total exports rose by 54% in value (from €598 million to €921 million), while imports grew more modestly at 26% (from €191 million to €240 million). The resulting trade surplus expanded by 67%, reaching €681 million in the final year. However, beneath this aggregate strength lie significant structural shifts in partner geography, product mix, and market concentration that deserve closer examination.
1. The EU's growing export surplus driven by value rather than volume
1.1. Export growth was predominantly price-driven
The headline 54% increase in EU exports masks a more nuanced reality. Export volumes grew only 13.7% over the decade (from 117,440 tonnes to 133,565 tonnes), while average export unit values surged 35.4% (from €5,093 to €6,894 per tonne). This indicates that the EU's competitive advantage lies less in expanding physical output and more in commanding higher prices — likely reflecting a shift toward higher-value formulations, specialty coatings, and stronger branding in global markets. EU production data supports this interpretation: while physical output grew only 2.5% (from 469,000 to 481,000 tonnes), production value increased by 32% (from €1.58 billion to €2.09 billion), confirming a clear value-over-volume trend across the sector.
1.2. Import volumes declined despite rising values
On the import side, the picture is strikingly different. Import volumes actually declined by 6.4% (from 41,492 tonnes to 38,838 tonnes), yet import values rose 26% to €240 million. This implies that unit import prices climbed 34.3% (from €4,605 to €6,185 per tonne), almost as steeply as export prices. The convergence of import and export unit values — which were €1,088 apart in 2015 but only €709 apart by 2025 — suggests that imported products are moving upmarket, or that global input cost inflation has affected all segments. The declining import volume also points to the EU's increasing self-sufficiency in this product category.
1.3. Germany, Spain, and Italy drove the export expansion
The concentration of export capacity within the EU is significant. Germany alone accounted for €318 million in exports in 2025 (a 41% increase), representing roughly one-third of the EU total. Italy (+76%) and especially Spain (+192%, from €23 million to €68 million) posted the fastest growth among the larger member states, while France more than doubled its exports to €53 million. On the import side, Belgium (+195%), Italy (+156%), and Poland (+146%) saw the largest increases, though Germany remained the top importer despite a 13% decline to €40 million.
| EU Member State | Exports 2015 (€M) | Exports 2025 (€M) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 226 | 318 | +40.9 |
| Belgium | 98 | 125 | +27.9 |
| Netherlands | 76 | 89 | +17.1 |
| Italy | 48 | 85 | +75.9 |
| Spain | 23 | 68 | +192.3 |
| France | 25 | 53 | +109.6 |
| Poland | 28 | 48 | +67.2 |
2. A dramatic geographic reorientation of EU trade flows
2.1. The collapse of exports to Russia restructured the EU's partner landscape
The single most dramatic event in this decade was the near-total cessation of EU exports to Russia. In 2015, Russia was the EU's third-largest export destination at €67 million; by 2025, exports had fallen to just €85,000 — a decline of 99.9%. This supply shock, driven by EU sanctions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, eliminated what had been a significant market virtually overnight. The shock was detected with a high coefficient of variation of 0.70, confirming the extreme volatility of this trade relationship.
2.2. Turkey, the United States, and Ukraine absorbed much of the redirected flow
Remarkably, the EU successfully redirected its export capacity. Turkey became a major growth market, with exports surging 134% from €42 million to €97 million — making it the EU's second-largest non-EU export destination by 2025. The United States also grew strongly (+121%, from €42 million to €92 million), as did Ukraine (+122%, from €12 million to €26 million). The United Kingdom, despite Brexit, remained the top partner with moderate growth of 26% to €108 million. This diversification mitigated what could have been a severe market loss.
| Export Partner | 2015 (€M) | 2025 (€M) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 86 | 108 | +25.5 |
| Türkiye | 42 | 97 | +134.3 |
| Russian Federation | 67 | 0.1 | −99.9 |
| United States | 42 | 92 | +121.0 |
| China | 43 | 48 | +12.9 |
| Switzerland | 38 | 41 | +8.3 |
| Ukraine | 12 | 26 | +121.5 |
2.3. China's role in EU imports grew dramatically while Switzerland receded
On the import side, China's presence expanded 664% — from just €2.2 million in 2015 to €16.5 million in 2025. Turkey also grew significantly as a supplier (+49% to €8.7 million). By contrast, Switzerland — previously the second-largest import source at €43 million — declined by 26% to €32 million. The United Kingdom remained the dominant import partner (€138 million, +32%), reflecting deep supply-chain integration that has persisted post-Brexit. Japan's import share also grew notably (+64% to €14 million), suggesting a growing market for specialty Asian formulations.
3. Structural shifts toward greater openness and self-sufficiency
3.1. The EU strengthened its position as a net exporter
The EU's net import reliance — a negative figure indicating net exporter status — deepened from −13.7% in 2015 to −47.7% in 2025. This means the EU's export surplus relative to apparent consumption roughly tripled over the decade. The sharpest deterioration of this metric (i.e., the strongest swing toward export dominance) occurred between 2020 and 2023, coinciding with the post-pandemic recovery and the redirection of exports away from Russia toward alternative markets.
3.2. Trade openness and export propensity increased markedly
Both trade intensity (the combined share of imports and exports in production) and export propensity (exports as a share of production) roughly doubled. Trade intensity rose from 27.7% to 50.3%, while export propensity climbed from 21.1% to 44.3%. These figures indicate that the EU's acrylic paint sector became substantially more integrated into global markets over the decade — nearly one euro in two of production value now crosses the EU's external border.
3.3. Export concentration declined, but import concentration remained elevated
The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for exports fell from 595 to 527 (−11%), reflecting the diversification away from Russia and toward a broader set of markets. Imports, however, remained far more concentrated, with an HHI of 3,621 — a level that indicates moderate-to-high concentration, driven largely by the United Kingdom's dominant share. The relative stability of the import HHI (+1.3%) suggests that the structural composition of import suppliers has not fundamentally changed despite China's rapid ascent. Germany, Belgium, Slovenia, and Sweden emerged as the most specialised EU producers (as measured by revealed symmetric comparative advantage), while Ireland and Malta showed minimal specialisation in this product category.
3.4. The VOC-heavy subsegment (32082010) showed divergent trends
Examining the two sub-product segments provides additional nuance. The larger category — standard paints and varnishes (CN 32082090) — saw import volumes decline from 33,269 to 29,843 tonnes, while the solvent-heavy solutions (CN 32082010) experienced a more pronounced drop from 8,223 to 8,993 tonnes on the import side. On the export side, 32082010 rebounded strongly in 2025 after declining in prior years, reaching 33,385 tonnes. Given tightening EU environmental regulations on volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the gradual decline in import volumes of the high-solvent segment may partly reflect regulatory pressure, though the product category's continued export strength suggests that EU manufacturers retain competitive advantages in these formulations for third-country markets where VOC norms are less stringent.
Conclusion
Over the 2015–2025 decade, the EU's acrylic paints and varnishes sector underwent a transformation marked by three overarching dynamics: a decisive shift from volume to value, a dramatic geographic reorientation following the loss of the Russian market, and a deepening of the EU's role as a global net exporter. The trade surplus nearly doubled, underpinned not by massive increases in physical output but by higher unit values and successful market diversification toward Turkey, the United States, and Ukraine. China's rapidly growing import presence — up over 600% — warrants monitoring, though it remains small in absolute terms. The sector's rising trade intensity and export propensity signal an industry increasingly oriented toward global markets, while the declining export concentration (HHI) suggests a healthier, more diversified trade structure. Looking ahead, the interplay between tightening EU VOC regulations and competitive positioning in less-regulated export markets will be a key dynamic shaping this sector's evolution.